Gender-critical opinions: Philosophical beliefs?
Under the Equality Act 2010, certain individuals such as employees and “workers” (think Uber drivers) are given protection against being discriminated against on the grounds of religion or belief.
Fishbourne Developments Ltd v Stephens  EWCA Civ 1704
In this case the appellants were a development company who were granted an option to purchase a farm. The owner of the farm died in 2014 and her interest passed to her daughter the respondent.
Under the terms of the option agreement the exercise of the option was conditional upon the grantee obtaining “Planning Permission”. “Planning Permission” was defined in the agreement as “planning permission granted by the Local Planning authority permitting any development of the Property”. The developer claimed that “development” had the meaning contained in section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 and therefore could relate to the development of the whole or any part of the property. In 2016 the appellant obtained planning permission for a new roof on one of the farms agricultural buildings. The developer then sought to exercise the option on the basis that the permission for the new roof fell within the definition of planning permission in the agreement which would allow it to purchase the farm at a discount. The High Court held that “any development” of the Property in the definition of planning permission was limited to a planning permission of the development of the whole or substantially the whole of the property by the erection of new buildings or new buildings involving a change of use. The developer appealed.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the developer’s appeal. They found the High Court judge was correct as it would make little commercial sense to allow the appellant to rely on an inconsequential planning permission to trigger a 30% discount in the price. This discount envisaged that the grantor had taken steps to enhance the land value in order to exercise the option. The word “development” in the option agreement had more than one possible meaning. The court has the discretion to weigh up the implications of different interpretations and apply “business common sense” to its decision.
If you have any queries relating to commercial property matters do not hesitate to contact Susanne Hinde on 01223 532728 or Stuart Simoes on 020 4526 4987 or another member of our commercial property team.
As of 21 June 2021, tenants have powers to seek variations to tenancies of agricultural holdings.
With reports in the past week that almost 100,000 small construction businesses are now facing financial difficulties, this is an issue for employers, building supply chains as well as contractors. So, what is happening and what are the options to minimise the risk?
The Charities Bill 2021 was announced in the Queen’s Speech on 11 May 2021 and, if adopted by Parliament, will enact important changes to streamline the existing legal framework. The Government claims that new legislation will support charities by reducing unnecessary bureaucracy